Independent guidance. Clear sources. A more informed next step.How we use the data ↗

Career profile · 47-1011

First-Line Supervisors of Construction Trades and Extraction Workers

Directly supervise and coordinate activities of construction or extraction workers.

What the work can involve

  • Inspect work progress, equipment, or construction sites to verify safety or to ensure that specifications are met.
  • Read specifications, such as blueprints, to determine construction requirements or to plan procedures.
  • Supervise, coordinate, or schedule the activities of construction or extractive workers.
  • Assign work to employees, based on material or worker requirements of specific jobs.
  • Coordinate work activities with other construction project activities.
  • Estimate material or worker requirements to complete jobs.

Selected core tasks from O*NET 31.0. Responsibilities vary by employer, specialization and experience.

Preparation and entry routes

O*NET Job Zone 3: Medium preparation

This broad O*NET group commonly involves vocational training, related experience or an associate-level route. It does not mean every course in a related subject meets the requirements.

Check the route for the specific occupation where you plan to work. Education, employer experience requirements, occupational licensing and industry certification can be separate steps.

Understand the different credentials →

Skills used in this occupation

  • Active Listening
  • Speaking
  • Critical Thinking
  • Monitoring
  • Reading Comprehension

Selected from the highest importance ratings available in O*NET 31.0. These describe the occupation, not a particular school's curriculum.

Knowledge to build

  • Administration and Management
  • Building and Construction
  • Mechanical
  • Customer and Personal Service
  • English Language

Selected from the highest importance ratings available in O*NET 31.0. These describe the occupation, not a particular school's curriculum.

Common work activities

  • Communicating with Supervisors, Peers, or Subordinates
  • Making Decisions and Solving Problems
  • Inspecting Equipment, Structures, or Materials
  • Getting Information
  • Coordinating the Work and Activities of Others

Selected from the highest importance ratings available in O*NET 31.0. These describe the occupation, not a particular school's curriculum.

Training subjects to investigate

The federal education-to-occupation crosswalk connects this role to the subjects below. These links do not endorse a school or guarantee that any particular award qualifies a graduate for the job.

Working conditions to consider

These are the most common published responses to selected O*NET work-setting questions. They describe occupation-level survey findings, not every employer or a particular job.

Work-setting questionMost common responseShare giving that response
Contact With OthersConstant contact with others97.0%08/2020 · sample 33
Exposed to ContaminantsEvery day49.5%08/2020 · sample 33
Exposed to Disease or InfectionsNever96.0%08/2020 · sample 33
Exposed to Hazardous ConditionsNever34.4%08/2020 · sample 33
Spend Time SittingLess than half the time42.7%08/2020 · sample 32
Spend Time StandingContinually or almost continually33.6%08/2020 · sample 33
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or ControlsLess than half the time48.5%08/2020 · sample 32
Time PressureEvery day40.9%08/2020 · sample 33
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life JacketsEvery day89.8%08/2020 · sample 32
Work SchedulesRegular (established routine, set schedule)58.7%08/2020 · sample 33

O*NET 31.0 Work Context, selected topics. Only unsuppressed source responses with sample size at least 10 are shown. A most-common response need not be a majority. Sampling uncertainty applies; source dates vary. Ask employers about actual schedules, accessibility, protective equipment and working conditions.

Software used in the workplace

Use these O*NET examples to ask how a course builds practical digital skills. They are workplace examples, not a required shopping list or confirmation of a school’s curriculum.

  • Analytical or scientific software: Procore software
  • Calendar and scheduling software: FranklinCovey TabletPlanner, Scheduling software
  • Computer aided design CAD software: Autodesk AutoCAD
  • Data base user interface and query software: Mi-Co Mi-Forms, QuickBase business management software, Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate
  • Development environment software: Prolog
  • Document management software: Adobe Acrobat
  • Electronic mail software: Microsoft Outlook
  • Graphics or photo imaging software: Graphics software
  • Inventory management software: Inventory tracking software
  • Office suite software: Microsoft Office software
  • Presentation software: Microsoft PowerPoint
  • Project management software: HCSS HeavyJob, Microsoft Project, Oracle Primavera Enterprise Project Portfolio Management, Oracle Primavera P6 Enterprise Portfolio Project Management

Selected categories and examples from O*NET 31.0 Software Skills. Products and employer requirements change. These examples are not endorsements; check the complete official occupation profile.

Physical demands and schedule evidence

BLS surveyed jobs in the broader occupation First-line supervisors of construction trades and extraction workers (SOC 47-1011). These preliminary 2025 estimates describe work requirements across surveyed employers. Individual workplaces, adjustments and duties differ.

Explore 57 occupational requirement estimates
RequirementShare of workersStandard error
Workers that had work schedule variability required This estimate is the mode for the category group.60.8%14.1 percentage points
Workers that had the ability to pause work This estimate is the mode for the category group.87.0%3.1 percentage points
Workers that had the ability to telework Estimate is less than 10 percent.<10%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required on-the-job training This estimate is the mode for the category group.70.6%8.7 percentage points
Workers that required prior work experience This estimate is the mode for the category group.97.4%1.7 percentage points
Workers that were not exposed to extreme cold Estimate is greater than 99.5 percent. This estimate is the mode for the category group.>99.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, seldom Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, occasionally Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were not exposed to extreme heat This estimate is the mode for the category group.99.2%Not published Standard error is less than 0.5.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, seldom Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, occasionally Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat0.8%Not published Standard error is less than 0.5.
Workers that were exposed to quiet noise Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to moderate noise This estimate is the mode for the category group.89.5%4.8 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to loud noise10.5%4.8 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to very loud noise Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that used personal protective equipment to mitigate exposure to noise55.5%4.9 percentage points
Workers that were not exposed to outdoors3.8%2.9 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, seldom2.0%1.2 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, occasionally34.5%8.6 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, frequently This estimate is the mode for the category group.37.5%5.0 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, constantly22.3%5.9 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors96.2%2.9 percentage points
Workers that were allowed the choice of sitting or standing45.9%8.0 percentage points
Workers that were not allowed the choice of sitting or standing This estimate is the mode for the category group.54.1%8.0 percentage points
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, seldom This estimate is the mode for the category group.40.3%3.4 percentage points
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, occasionally22.1%6.6 percentage points
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds62.5%8.5 percentage points
Workers that required driving This estimate is the mode for the category group.83.2%9.7 percentage points
Workers that required low postures, seldom26.6%4.8 percentage points
Workers that required low postures, occasionally This estimate is the mode for the category group.45.9%7.8 percentage points
Workers that required low postures, frequently2.7%Not published Standard error is less than 0.5.
Workers that required low postures, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required work in low postures75.2%7.3 percentage points
Workers that could choose to crawl when in low postures Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that could choose to stoop when in low postures This estimate is the mode for the category group.48.7%6.0 percentage points
Workers that could choose to kneel when in low postures This estimate is the mode for the category group.43.2%8.3 percentage points
Workers that could choose to crouch when in low postures This estimate is the mode for the category group.52.0%6.9 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead, seldom This estimate is the mode for the category group.34.5%10.9 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead, occasionally19.1%3.6 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required reaching overhead, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required reaching overhead with one hand7.9%5.1 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead with both hands This estimate is the mode for the category group.45.8%7.3 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead53.7%11.1 percentage points
Workers that required a sedentary strength level7.8%4.0 percentage points
Workers that required a light strength level37.8%10.6 percentage points
Workers that required a medium strength level This estimate is the mode for the category group.48.7%11.2 percentage points
Workers that required a heavy strength level Estimate is less than 10 percent.<10%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required a very heavy strength level Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.

Use this evidence to ask about the actual work environment and available accommodations. It is not a medical assessment or a reason to rule yourself out of an occupation.

BLS Occupational Requirements Survey, preliminary 2025, released January 16, 2026; samples collected August 2023–July 2025. Source bounds such as “less than” are preserved. Categories are not necessarily additive. Understanding standard errors.

Pay & employment outlook

Salary estimates for first-line supervisors of construction trades and extraction workers

National median annual wage$79,920May 2025 · existing wage and salary workers
National median hourly wage$38.42May 2025 · where BLS publishes hourly pay
Middle 50% of annual wages$63,400–$101,46025th–75th percentile · not an entry-level pay range
Estimated employment812,210May 2025 · excludes self-employed workers

The median divides workers into two equally sized groups by pay. It is not a starting salary, a school’s graduate outcome or a promise of employment. Lower percentiles are not automatically new graduates.

National outlook: 2025–2035

Projected employment change+5%913,300 to 959,400 jobs
Projected openings per year67,000Annual average · growth plus replacement needs
Typical education for entry
High school diploma or equivalent
Related work experience
5 years or more
Typical on-the-job training
None

BLS national employment projections, 2025–2035. Openings include people leaving occupations or the labor force; these are not advertised vacancies. Education categories describe typical entry, not legal eligibility or a guarantee that any specific program is sufficient.

Compare wages across 51 state/DC estimates
May 2025 cross-industry wage estimates for First-Line Supervisors of Construction Trades and Extraction Workers
StateAnnual medianHourly medianEmployment
Alabama$64,120$30.8313,580
Alaska$102,140$49.102,690
Arizona$78,550$37.7621,550
Arkansas$61,230$29.446,590
California$97,680$46.9671,750
Colorado$81,230$39.0521,380
Connecticut$92,260$44.366,980
Delaware$81,100$38.992,590
District of Columbia$86,520$41.601,420
Florida$75,790$36.4469,830
Georgia$78,430$37.7126,770
Hawaii$102,630$49.342,890
Idaho$75,550$36.326,730
Illinois$105,750$50.8419,340
Indiana$82,530$39.6816,450
Iowa$78,510$37.759,660
Kansas$76,780$36.918,940
Kentucky$73,490$35.339,620
Louisiana$75,360$36.2314,070
Maine$77,290$37.163,130
Maryland$78,760$37.8715,400
Massachusetts$97,850$47.0418,330
Michigan$78,180$37.5916,660
Minnesota$97,610$46.9313,580
Mississippi$66,910$32.177,040
Missouri$87,520$42.0813,330
Montana$76,910$36.984,350
Nebraska$75,570$36.336,020
Nevada$81,990$39.429,680
New Hampshire$81,220$39.053,590
New Jersey$105,510$50.7316,230
New Mexico$75,130$36.126,790
New York$95,700$46.0129,600
North Carolina$75,270$36.1932,460
North Dakota$81,370$39.124,350
Ohio$79,580$38.2623,640
Oklahoma$73,040$35.1111,520
Oregon$103,070$49.557,890
Pennsylvania$81,540$39.2026,860
Rhode Island$98,590$47.402,060
South Carolina$75,350$36.2313,150
South Dakota$77,690$37.352,360
Tennessee$74,470$35.8117,770
Texas$74,520$35.8390,010
Utah$77,280$37.1514,270
Vermont$82,490$39.661,010
Virginia$78,640$37.8124,970
Washington$109,570$52.6819,550
West Virginia$80,060$38.495,380
Wisconsin$85,350$41.0315,150
Wyoming$78,250$37.623,270

Metropolitan and nonmetropolitan wages

Search the 530 published local-area estimates for this occupation. Metropolitan areas can cross state lines; a city’s postal name is not necessarily the statistical area’s name.

Sources: BLS May 2025 OEWS public downloads and 2025–2035 employment projections, retrieved September 9, 2026. Unpublished estimates stay unavailable. “+” means BLS’s upper reporting threshold ($239,200 annually or $115 hourly). Wages exclude self-employment and nonwage benefits. How to interpret these figures.

Compare the route and prepare for work

Questions to test the fit

  1. What does an entry-level working day look like, and how does it differ from the experienced role described here?
  2. Which tasks, work environments and schedules would I enjoy or find difficult?
  3. What education, supervised practice and credentials do local employers actually request?
  4. Can I speak with someone in the occupation or arrange a suitable workplace visit?
  5. How does the complete training cost compare with my realistic budget and available routes?
Use the career-change checklist →

Related occupations to compare

Related through shared training-subject mappings. Entry requirements can differ substantially.

Sources and attribution

This page includes information from the O*NET 31.0 Database by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA), used under CC BY 4.0. Trade School Guides selects and organizes the material and adds explanatory guidance. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed or tested these modifications. Occupation code: 47-1011.00.

Training connections: CIP 2020–SOC 2018 crosswalk. Snapshot: September 8, 2026. See the methodology.