Independent guidance. Clear sources. A more informed next step.How we use the data ↗

Career profile · 13-1082

Project Management Specialists

Analyze and coordinate the schedule, timeline, procurement, staffing, and budget of a product or service on a per project basis. Lead and guide the work of technical staff. May serve as a point of contact for the client or customer.

What the work can involve

  • Communicate with key stakeholders to determine project requirements and objectives.
  • Identify project needs such as resources, staff, or finances by reviewing project objectives and schedules.
  • Submit project deliverables to clients, ensuring adherence to quality standards.
  • Confer with project personnel to identify and resolve problems.
  • Plan, schedule, or coordinate project activities to meet deadlines.
  • Request and review project updates to ensure deadlines are met.

Selected core tasks from O*NET 31.0. Responsibilities vary by employer, specialization and experience.

Preparation and entry routes

O*NET Job Zone 4: Considerable preparation

This O*NET group commonly calls for substantial preparation, often including a bachelor’s degree or considerable relevant experience. An introductory vocational course alone may not provide an entry route.

Check the route for the specific occupation where you plan to work. Education, employer experience requirements, occupational licensing and industry certification can be separate steps.

Understand the different credentials →

Skills used in this occupation

  • Active Listening
  • Critical Thinking
  • Monitoring
  • Writing
  • Active Learning

Selected from the highest importance ratings available in O*NET 31.0. These describe the occupation, not a particular school's curriculum.

Knowledge to build

  • English Language
  • Administration and Management
  • Administrative
  • Customer and Personal Service
  • Computers and Electronics

Selected from the highest importance ratings available in O*NET 31.0. These describe the occupation, not a particular school's curriculum.

Common work activities

  • Communicating with Supervisors, Peers, or Subordinates
  • Getting Information
  • Working with Computers
  • Making Decisions and Solving Problems
  • Organizing, Planning, and Prioritizing Work

Selected from the highest importance ratings available in O*NET 31.0. These describe the occupation, not a particular school's curriculum.

Training subjects to investigate

The federal education-to-occupation crosswalk connects this role to the subjects below. These links do not endorse a school or guarantee that any particular award qualifies a graduate for the job.

Working conditions to consider

These are the most common published responses to selected O*NET work-setting questions. They describe occupation-level survey findings, not every employer or a particular job.

Work-setting questionMost common responseShare giving that response
Contact With OthersConstant contact with others51.5%08/2026 · sample 33
Exposed to ContaminantsNever87.9%08/2026 · sample 33
Exposed to Disease or InfectionsNever93.9%08/2026 · sample 33
Exposed to Hazardous ConditionsNever87.5%08/2026 · sample 32
Spend Time SittingContinually or almost continually63.6%08/2026 · sample 33
Spend Time StandingLess than half the time63.6%08/2026 · sample 33
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or ControlsNever30.3%08/2026 · sample 33
Time PressureOnce a week or more but not every day42.4%08/2026 · sample 33
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life JacketsNever69.7%08/2026 · sample 33
Work SchedulesRegular (established routine, set schedule)66.7%08/2026 · sample 33

O*NET 31.0 Work Context, selected topics. Only unsuppressed source responses with sample size at least 10 are shown. A most-common response need not be a majority. Sampling uncertainty applies; source dates vary. Ask employers about actual schedules, accessibility, protective equipment and working conditions.

Software used in the workplace

Use these O*NET examples to ask how a course builds practical digital skills. They are workplace examples, not a required shopping list or confirmation of a school’s curriculum.

  • Accounting software: Intuit QuickBooks
  • Analytical or scientific software: IBM SPSS Statistics, Procore software, SAS
  • Application server software: GitHub
  • Business intelligence and data analysis software: IBM Cognos Impromptu, Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition, Qlik Tech QlikView, Tableau
  • Cloud-based data access and sharing software: Asana, Dropbox, Google Drive, Slack
  • Computer aided design CAD software: Autodesk AutoCAD Civil 3D, Bentley MicroStation
  • Computer based training software: Blackboard software, Moodle, Padlet
  • Content workflow software: Atlassian JIRA
  • Customer relationship management CRM software: Salesforce software
  • Data base reporting software: SAP Crystal Reports
  • Data base user interface and query software: Airtable, Microsoft Access, Oracle Database
  • Desktop communications software: Eko, Skype

Selected categories and examples from O*NET 31.0 Software Skills. Products and employer requirements change. These examples are not endorsements; check the complete official occupation profile.

Physical demands and schedule evidence

BLS surveyed jobs in the broader occupation Project management specialists (SOC 13-1082). These preliminary 2025 estimates describe work requirements across surveyed employers. Individual workplaces, adjustments and duties differ.

Explore 55 occupational requirement estimates
RequirementShare of workersStandard error
Workers that had work schedule variability required21.6%7.6 percentage points
Workers that had the ability to pause work Estimate is greater than 95 percent. This estimate is the mode for the category group.>95%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that had the ability to telework This estimate is the mode for the category group.53.9%7.3 percentage points
Workers that required on-the-job training This estimate is the mode for the category group.63.5%8.4 percentage points
Workers that required prior work experience This estimate is the mode for the category group.96.4%1.5 percentage points
Workers that were not exposed to extreme cold Estimate is greater than 99.5 percent. This estimate is the mode for the category group.>99.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, seldom Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, occasionally Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were not exposed to extreme heat Estimate is greater than 99.5 percent. This estimate is the mode for the category group.>99.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, seldom Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, occasionally Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to quiet noise33.0%7.3 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to moderate noise This estimate is the mode for the category group.65.1%7.3 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to loud noise Estimate is less than 10 percent.<10%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to very loud noise Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that used personal protective equipment to mitigate exposure to noise9.3%2.4 percentage points
Workers that were not exposed to outdoors This estimate is the mode for the category group.62.5%8.8 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, seldom14.1%3.8 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, occasionally15.2%4.1 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, frequently8.2%7.2 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to outdoors37.5%8.8 percentage points
Workers that were allowed the choice of sitting or standing This estimate is the mode for the category group.89.1%4.7 percentage points
Workers that were not allowed the choice of sitting or standing10.9%4.7 percentage points
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, seldom14.0%3.7 percentage points
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, occasionally Estimate is less than 10 percent.<10%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds16.5%4.1 percentage points
Workers that required driving46.2%7.4 percentage points
Workers that required low postures, seldom10.0%4.7 percentage points
Workers that required low postures, occasionally4.9%2.4 percentage points
Workers that required low postures, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required low postures, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required work in low postures14.9%5.1 percentage points
Workers that could choose to crawl when in low postures Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that could choose to kneel when in low postures11.5%4.6 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead, seldom9.9%3.8 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead, occasionally Estimate is less than 5 percent.<5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required reaching overhead, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required reaching overhead, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required reaching overhead with one hand4.2%2.4 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead with both hands This estimate is the mode for the category group.6.5%3.4 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead10.8%4.0 percentage points
Workers that required a sedentary strength level This estimate is the mode for the category group.77.1%4.8 percentage points
Workers that required a light strength level17.2%4.1 percentage points
Workers that required a medium strength level5.1%3.3 percentage points
Workers that required a heavy strength level Estimate is less than 5 percent.<5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required a very heavy strength level Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.

Use this evidence to ask about the actual work environment and available accommodations. It is not a medical assessment or a reason to rule yourself out of an occupation.

BLS Occupational Requirements Survey, preliminary 2025, released January 16, 2026; samples collected August 2023–July 2025. Source bounds such as “less than” are preserved. Categories are not necessarily additive. Understanding standard errors.

Pay & employment outlook

Salary estimates for project management specialists

National median annual wage$102,320May 2025 · existing wage and salary workers
National median hourly wage$49.19May 2025 · where BLS publishes hourly pay
Middle 50% of annual wages$78,440–$133,10025th–75th percentile · not an entry-level pay range
Estimated employment1,066,670May 2025 · excludes self-employed workers

The median divides workers into two equally sized groups by pay. It is not a starting salary, a school’s graduate outcome or a promise of employment. Lower percentiles are not automatically new graduates.

National outlook: 2025–2035

Projected employment change+6.7%1,094,300 to 1,167,400 jobs
Projected openings per year76,500Annual average · growth plus replacement needs
Typical education for entry
Bachelor's degree
Related work experience
None
Typical on-the-job training
None

BLS national employment projections, 2025–2035. Openings include people leaving occupations or the labor force; these are not advertised vacancies. Education categories describe typical entry, not legal eligibility or a guarantee that any specific program is sufficient.

Compare wages across 51 state/DC estimates
May 2025 cross-industry wage estimates for Project Management Specialists
StateAnnual medianHourly medianEmployment
Alabama$100,820$48.473,190
Alaska$99,580$47.881,950
Arizona$99,050$47.6222,920
Arkansas$77,170$37.105,510
California$120,910$58.13114,380
Colorado$110,050$52.9132,390
Connecticut$105,240$50.608,410
Delaware$122,190$58.751,770
District of Columbia$104,900$50.435,170
Florida$98,070$47.1576,370
Georgia$102,140$49.1128,900
Hawaii$78,000$37.501,560
Idaho$95,630$45.985,750
Illinois$103,470$49.7527,180
Indiana$95,020$45.6811,970
Iowa$96,540$46.416,720
Kansas$100,010$48.086,030
Kentucky$81,700$39.2810,250
Louisiana$84,850$40.798,050
Maine$101,830$48.962,620
Maryland$104,040$50.0230,530
Massachusetts$114,190$54.9021,960
Michigan$100,970$48.5525,330
Minnesota$97,860$47.0518,850
Mississippi$78,870$37.924,320
Missouri$94,660$45.5121,460
Montana$87,890$42.252,940
Nebraska$80,150$38.543,190
Nevada$99,940$48.058,290
New Hampshire$90,890$43.703,840
New Jersey$122,980$59.1228,300
New Mexico$106,970$51.434,330
New York$121,040$58.1968,020
North Carolina$100,820$48.4736,200
North Dakota$96,160$46.232,020
Ohio$95,770$46.0434,260
Oklahoma$86,240$41.4611,220
Oregon$105,480$50.7119,380
Pennsylvania$100,150$48.1536,150
Rhode Island$104,680$50.333,880
South Carolina$95,040$45.6917,040
South Dakota$82,250$39.541,310
Tennessee$85,890$41.3020,780
Texas$98,440$47.33138,960
Utah$96,720$46.5016,450
Vermont$80,800$38.851,190
Virginia$120,840$58.1043,860
Washington$124,160$59.6936,240
West Virginia$91,780$44.132,520
Wisconsin$97,580$46.9121,610
Wyoming$94,080$45.231,180

Metropolitan and nonmetropolitan wages

Search the 524 published local-area estimates for this occupation. Metropolitan areas can cross state lines; a city’s postal name is not necessarily the statistical area’s name.

Sources: BLS May 2025 OEWS public downloads and 2025–2035 employment projections, retrieved September 9, 2026. Unpublished estimates stay unavailable. “+” means BLS’s upper reporting threshold ($239,200 annually or $115 hourly). Wages exclude self-employment and nonwage benefits. How to interpret these figures.

Compare the route and prepare for work

Questions to test the fit

  1. What does an entry-level working day look like, and how does it differ from the experienced role described here?
  2. Which tasks, work environments and schedules would I enjoy or find difficult?
  3. What education, supervised practice and credentials do local employers actually request?
  4. Can I speak with someone in the occupation or arrange a suitable workplace visit?
  5. How does the complete training cost compare with my realistic budget and available routes?
Use the career-change checklist →

Related occupations to compare

Related through shared training-subject mappings. Entry requirements can differ substantially.

Sources and attribution

This page includes information from the O*NET 31.0 Database by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA), used under CC BY 4.0. Trade School Guides selects and organizes the material and adds explanatory guidance. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed or tested these modifications. Occupation code: 13-1082.00.

Training connections: CIP 2020–SOC 2018 crosswalk. Snapshot: September 8, 2026. See the methodology.