Independent guidance. Clear sources. A more informed next step.How we use the data ↗

Career profile · 39-2021

Animal Caretakers

Feed, water, groom, bathe, exercise, or otherwise provide care to promote and maintain the well-being of pets and other animals that are not raised for consumption, such as dogs, cats, race horses, ornamental fish or birds, zoo animals, and mice. Work in settings such as kennels, animal shelters, zoos, circuses, and aquariums. May keep records of feedings, treatments, and animals received or discharged. May clean, disinfect, and repair cages, pens, or fish tanks.

What the work can involve

  • Feed and water animals according to schedules and feeding instructions.
  • Provide treatment to sick or injured animals, or contact veterinarians to secure treatment.
  • Examine and observe animals to detect signs of illness, disease, or injury.
  • Mix food, liquid formulas, medications, or food supplements according to instructions, prescriptions, and knowledge of animal species.
  • Do facility laundry and clean, organize, maintain, and disinfect animal quarters, such as pens and stables, and equipment, such as saddles and bridles.
  • Exercise animals to maintain their physical and mental health.

Selected core tasks from O*NET 31.0. Responsibilities vary by employer, specialization and experience.

Preparation and entry routes

O*NET Job Zone 2: Some preparation

This broad O*NET group commonly involves some prior preparation and on-the-job learning. Check the specific employer, occupational credential and state requirements.

Check the route for the specific occupation where you plan to work. Education, employer experience requirements, occupational licensing and industry certification can be separate steps.

Understand the different credentials →

Skills used in this occupation

  • Monitoring
  • Active Listening
  • Reading Comprehension
  • Speaking
  • Critical Thinking

Selected from the highest importance ratings available in O*NET 31.0. These describe the occupation, not a particular school's curriculum.

Knowledge to build

  • Customer and Personal Service
  • Administrative
  • English Language
  • Education and Training
  • Administration and Management

Selected from the highest importance ratings available in O*NET 31.0. These describe the occupation, not a particular school's curriculum.

Common work activities

  • Getting Information
  • Communicating with Supervisors, Peers, or Subordinates
  • Performing General Physical Activities
  • Identifying Objects, Actions, and Events
  • Handling and Moving Objects

Selected from the highest importance ratings available in O*NET 31.0. These describe the occupation, not a particular school's curriculum.

Training subjects to investigate

The federal education-to-occupation crosswalk connects this role to the subjects below. These links do not endorse a school or guarantee that any particular award qualifies a graduate for the job.

Working conditions to consider

These are the most common published responses to selected O*NET work-setting questions. They describe occupation-level survey findings, not every employer or a particular job.

Work-setting questionMost common responseShare giving that response
Contact With OthersConstant contact with others76.8%08/2019 · sample 35
Exposed to ContaminantsEvery day63.3%08/2019 · sample 35
Exposed to Disease or InfectionsEvery day44.6%08/2019 · sample 34
Exposed to Hazardous ConditionsNever62.7%08/2019 · sample 35
Spend Time SittingLess than half the time51.2%08/2019 · sample 35
Spend Time StandingContinually or almost continually55.9%08/2019 · sample 35
Spend Time Using Your Hands to Handle, Control, or Feel Objects, Tools, or ControlsContinually or almost continually38.4%08/2019 · sample 35
Time PressureOnce a week or more but not every day31.8%08/2019 · sample 35
Wear Common Protective or Safety Equipment such as Safety Shoes, Glasses, Gloves, Hearing Protection, Hard Hats, or Life JacketsNever44.4%08/2019 · sample 35
Work SchedulesRegular (established routine, set schedule)97.5%08/2019 · sample 35

O*NET 31.0 Work Context, selected topics. Only unsuppressed source responses with sample size at least 10 are shown. A most-common response need not be a majority. Sampling uncertainty applies; source dates vary. Ask employers about actual schedules, accessibility, protective equipment and working conditions.

Software used in the workplace

Use these O*NET examples to ask how a course builds practical digital skills. They are workplace examples, not a required shopping list or confirmation of a school’s curriculum.

  • Calendar and scheduling software: DaySmart Software Appointment-Plus, Groom Pro, Mobile Dog Grooming Software mGroomer, Petschedule
  • Data base user interface and query software: CEEJS The Pet Groomer's Secretary, DaySmart Software 123Pet, Envision Pet Grooming, Groomsoft
  • Electronic mail software: Microsoft Outlook
  • Office suite software: Microsoft Office software
  • Presentation software: Microsoft PowerPoint
  • Spreadsheet software: Microsoft Excel
  • Word processing software: Microsoft Word

Selected categories and examples from O*NET 31.0 Software Skills. Products and employer requirements change. These examples are not endorsements; check the complete official occupation profile.

Physical demands and schedule evidence

BLS surveyed jobs in the broader occupation Animal caretakers (SOC 39-2021). These preliminary 2025 estimates describe work requirements across surveyed employers. Individual workplaces, adjustments and duties differ.

Explore 57 occupational requirement estimates
RequirementShare of workersStandard error
Workers that had work schedule variability required This estimate is the mode for the category group.54.5%7.7 percentage points
Workers that had the ability to pause work48.3%5.3 percentage points
Workers that had the ability to telework Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required on-the-job training This estimate is the mode for the category group.93.5%4.0 percentage points
Workers that required prior work experience29.3%5.5 percentage points
Workers that were not exposed to extreme cold Estimate is greater than 99.5 percent. This estimate is the mode for the category group.>99.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, seldom Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, occasionally Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme cold Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were not exposed to extreme heat Estimate is greater than 85 percent. This estimate is the mode for the category group.>85%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, seldom Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, occasionally Estimate is less than 15 percent.<15%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to extreme heat Estimate is less than 15 percent.<15%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to quiet noise Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that were exposed to moderate noise This estimate is the mode for the category group.76.1%7.3 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to loud noise23.9%7.3 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to very loud noise Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that used personal protective equipment to mitigate exposure to noise13.8%5.0 percentage points
Workers that were not exposed to outdoors27.6%5.0 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, seldom6.0%Not published Standard error is less than 0.5.
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, occasionally This estimate is the mode for the category group.49.0%6.8 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, frequently13.7%3.3 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors, constantly3.7%2.0 percentage points
Workers that were exposed to outdoors72.4%5.0 percentage points
Workers that were allowed the choice of sitting or standing2.3%1.6 percentage points
Workers that were not allowed the choice of sitting or standing This estimate is the mode for the category group.97.7%1.6 percentage points
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, seldom3.4%2.7 percentage points
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, occasionally7.2%4.7 percentage points
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required climbing ladders, ropes, or scaffolds10.6%5.3 percentage points
Workers that required driving12.0%4.0 percentage points
Workers that required low postures, seldom6.0%2.4 percentage points
Workers that required low postures, occasionally This estimate is the mode for the category group.83.7%3.6 percentage points
Workers that required low postures, frequently9.4%4.2 percentage points
Workers that required low postures, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required work in low postures Estimate is greater than 95 percent.>95%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that could choose to crawl when in low postures Estimate is less than 20 percent.<20%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that could choose to stoop when in low postures This estimate is the mode for the category group.77.3%5.5 percentage points
Workers that could choose to kneel when in low postures This estimate is the mode for the category group.75.5%4.1 percentage points
Workers that could choose to crouch when in low postures This estimate is the mode for the category group.74.9%6.4 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead, seldom27.6%5.4 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead, occasionally This estimate is the mode for the category group.36.9%8.2 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead, frequently Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required reaching overhead, constantly Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required reaching overhead with one hand15.7%5.5 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead with both hands This estimate is the mode for the category group.48.7%7.0 percentage points
Workers that required reaching overhead64.5%4.5 percentage points
Workers that required a sedentary strength level Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.
Workers that required a light strength level19.1%6.5 percentage points
Workers that required a medium strength level This estimate is the mode for the category group.69.9%7.5 percentage points
Workers that required a heavy strength level11.1%2.7 percentage points
Workers that required a very heavy strength level Estimate is less than 0.5 percent.<0.5%Not published The standard error is not available for this estimate.

Use this evidence to ask about the actual work environment and available accommodations. It is not a medical assessment or a reason to rule yourself out of an occupation.

BLS Occupational Requirements Survey, preliminary 2025, released January 16, 2026; samples collected August 2023–July 2025. Source bounds such as “less than” are preserved. Categories are not necessarily additive. Understanding standard errors.

Pay & employment outlook

Salary estimates for animal caretakers

National median annual wage$35,360May 2025 · existing wage and salary workers
National median hourly wage$17.00May 2025 · where BLS publishes hourly pay
Middle 50% of annual wages$29,820–$40,05025th–75th percentile · not an entry-level pay range
Estimated employment266,910May 2025 · excludes self-employed workers

The median divides workers into two equally sized groups by pay. It is not a starting salary, a school’s graduate outcome or a promise of employment. Lower percentiles are not automatically new graduates.

National outlook: 2025–2035

Projected employment change+12.1%365,300 to 409,400 jobs
Projected openings per year62,800Annual average · growth plus replacement needs
Typical education for entry
High school diploma or equivalent
Related work experience
None
Typical on-the-job training
Short-term on-the-job training

BLS national employment projections, 2025–2035. Openings include people leaving occupations or the labor force; these are not advertised vacancies. Education categories describe typical entry, not legal eligibility or a guarantee that any specific program is sufficient.

Compare wages across 51 state/DC estimates
May 2025 cross-industry wage estimates for Animal Caretakers
StateAnnual medianHourly medianEmployment
Alabama$28,330$13.624,100
Alaska$36,640$17.61550
Arizona$38,180$18.356,330
Arkansas$30,230$14.542,040
California$38,700$18.6025,710
Colorado$37,430$18.006,290
Connecticut$37,310$17.943,000
Delaware$33,910$16.301,230
District of Columbia$44,210$21.25460
Florida$34,150$16.4217,210
Georgia$29,860$14.369,110
Hawaii$40,130$19.29570
Idaho$32,170$15.471,760
Illinois$35,570$17.1011,070
Indiana$29,990$14.426,420
Iowa$30,080$14.463,480
Kansas$29,830$14.343,000
Kentucky$30,720$14.776,140
Louisiana$27,910$13.422,660
Maine$37,230$17.901,430
Maryland$36,780$17.685,570
Massachusetts$39,650$19.066,900
Michigan$30,320$14.586,290
Minnesota$36,430$17.514,250
Mississippi$26,970$12.971,900
Missouri$31,230$15.025,820
Montana$34,210$16.451,200
Nebraska$31,680$15.232,100
Nevada$30,320$14.582,470
New Hampshire$34,790$16.731,810
New Jersey$35,850$17.245,890
New Mexico$33,570$16.141,710
New York$37,840$18.1912,470
North Carolina$30,870$14.849,730
North Dakota$34,040$16.37770
Ohio$30,310$14.579,350
Oklahoma$28,940$13.923,170
Oregon$36,580$17.593,470
Pennsylvania$31,360$15.089,910
Rhode Island$37,120$17.851,020
South Carolina$31,280$15.044,090
South Dakota$30,390$14.611,110
Tennessee$30,550$14.696,110
Texas$32,730$15.7420,450
Utah$34,750$16.712,350
Vermont$36,090$17.35430
Virginia$34,380$16.5310,070
Washington$40,570$19.516,620
West Virginia$28,550$13.731,160
Wisconsin$30,160$14.505,720
Wyoming$29,080$13.98460

Metropolitan and nonmetropolitan wages

Search the 518 published local-area estimates for this occupation. Metropolitan areas can cross state lines; a city’s postal name is not necessarily the statistical area’s name.

Sources: BLS May 2025 OEWS public downloads and 2025–2035 employment projections, retrieved September 9, 2026. Unpublished estimates stay unavailable. “+” means BLS’s upper reporting threshold ($239,200 annually or $115 hourly). Wages exclude self-employment and nonwage benefits. How to interpret these figures.

Compare the route and prepare for work

Questions to test the fit

  1. What does an entry-level working day look like, and how does it differ from the experienced role described here?
  2. Which tasks, work environments and schedules would I enjoy or find difficult?
  3. What education, supervised practice and credentials do local employers actually request?
  4. Can I speak with someone in the occupation or arrange a suitable workplace visit?
  5. How does the complete training cost compare with my realistic budget and available routes?
Use the career-change checklist →

Related occupations to compare

Related through shared training-subject mappings. Entry requirements can differ substantially.

Sources and attribution

This page includes information from the O*NET 31.0 Database by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA), used under CC BY 4.0. Trade School Guides selects and organizes the material and adds explanatory guidance. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed or tested these modifications. Occupation code: 39-2021.00.

Training connections: CIP 2020–SOC 2018 crosswalk. Snapshot: September 8, 2026. See the methodology.